I'm always excited to connect with professionals, collaborate on cybersecurity projects, or share insights.
Bug bounty hunting isn’t just about spotting a vulnerability and rushing to hit “Submit.”
The real breakthroughs happen when you stop treating bugs as isolated flaws and start connecting them into something bigger.
One broken header.
A misconfigured CORS policy.
A weak injection.
Individually, they may look harmless. But together? They can tear a system wide open.
This is vulnerability chaining — and it’s how “informative” bugs become critical reports.
Table of contents [Show]
Most hunters are trained to see bugs as finished products: I found an IDOR, I’ll report it.
But chaining forces a different perspective.
The question isn’t what is this bug?
The question is what does this bug enable?
A read-only endpoint might look useless — until it leaks token formats.
A weak CORS policy is just noise — until you match it with an exposed API.
A dashboard XSS might seem contained — until you pair it with CSRF to reach another system.
On their own, they’re unremarkable.
Connected together, they’re a breach waiting to happen.
The biggest mistake hunters make is stopping too soon.
Platforms are flooded with reports like “Missing Rate Limiting” or “Open Redirect, No Impact.” And most of them are closed as Informative.
But the real hacker doesn’t ask, “Is this exploitable?”
They ask, “Where does this lead?”
Every rejected bug is a potential building block.
An error message leaking an internal hostname? Recon fuel.
A 403 on an upload endpoint? Maybe the auth check only fails on that method.
A login page with sloppy CORS? Suddenly it’s the perfect partner for an XSS payload.
Chaining is about seeing systems, not just issues. It’s about collecting parts of a puzzle and assembling the whole picture.
Every effective chain follows the same rhythm:
A chain isn’t about luck. It’s about engineering flow — connecting weaknesses until the target collapses.
The truth? It’s not laziness.
It’s training.
Most guides teach you to label bugs, not to connect them. So hunters stop after the first discovery.
But reports don’t win bounties — stories do.
Chaining rewires your thinking:
Once you start asking these questions, you stop being a participant in bug bounty — and start being a threat to broken systems.
Before you move on from any bug, ask yourself:
Every “low” finding is a doorway.
Your job is to test what’s on the other side.
To prove the point, let’s take a simple web app.
Profile pages. Feedback forms. Nothing exciting.
Individually, the bugs look dull: an injection here, an error message there.
But linked together? You end up with remote code execution.
In the video above, I walk through this complete chain step by step — from the first harmless input all the way to RCE. It shows exactly how weak points, when connected, become a full-blown compromise.
That’s the power of chaining. It’s not the bugs themselves — it’s the path they create when connected.
Here’s the takeaway:
Critical findings don’t always start critical.
They’re built through persistence, curiosity, and the ability to see how one weakness leads to another.
Where most hunters see “noise,” you should see opportunity.
The difference between an informative report and a critical payout often lies in a single question:
“What does this unlock?”
Bug bounty is no longer about spraying payloads or racing scanners.
The hunters who succeed today are the ones who slow down, think deeper, and connect the dots others miss.
Don’t just report bugs. Chain them.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *